Skip to content

Global Intelligence Blog

Insights and Analysis for the Data-Driven Enterprise

  • Data Quality Solutions
  • Request Demo
  • Blogs
    • Product News & Updates
    • Data-Driven Marketing
  • United States
    • United States
    • Australia
    • Germany
    • India
    • United Kingdom
  • 1-800-MELISSA

Global Intelligence Blog

Insights and Analysis for the Data-Driven Enterprise

You Can’t Identify the Problem Without a Scorecard

Blog Administrator | Analyzing Data Quality, Data Management, Data Quality | accuracy, completeness, data management, data quality, data quality managers, data quality standards, Metadata

By Elliot King

If you can’t measure a process, you can’t improve upon it. That’s one of the ironclad quality initiatives. Edward Deming’s revolutionary insight was that if you can measure a process or outcome continually, you have created the opportunity to improve it continually.

 If you can’t measure a process, you can’t improve upon it. That’s one of the
ironclad quality initiatives. Edward Deming’s revolutionary insight was that if
you can measure a process or outcome continually, you have created the
opportunity to improve it continually.

But measurement is only a starting point to quality improvement. Those
measurements have to be assessed according to specific standards and then their
impact on business operations has to be assessed. Only at that point can
managers determine whether investing in remediation is appropriate or cost
effective.

In many data quality improvement programs, data scorecards are the tools of
choice for data managers to place raw statistics into meaningful contexts. From
that point, different constituencies can identify problem areas and determine
what actions should be taken.

To understand the idea of a data scorecard, a baseball analogy actually works
here. Broken down into its granular bits, a baseball game consists of strikes
and balls, hits and outs.

But in most contexts (although not all), to know that there were 210 pitches, 13
hits and 8 runs scored has little value. That data has be to combined and
grouped correctly to have meaning. And different stakeholders–the players, the
manager, the front office, the opposing teams–may want that data in different
formats.

For data scorecards, the process of measuring and aggregating raw statistics
into useful combinations is called a hierarchical rollup. It could look like
this. At the most granular level, data is measured against the metadata
associated with the database. Are fields the right length? Is there missing
data? These statistics are of interest to database managers.

The next step is to assess whether the data meets data quality standards such as
accuracy and completeness. This is a concern to data quality managers. Does the
data conform to business rules? Business analysts need to know that. And what is
the impact of data quality on process outcomes? As that point, management can
determine what actions are prudent.

In baseball, a glance at a scorecard reveals the outcome of the game and who
played poorly as well as offering the chance to drill down deeper to the
underlying raw data if need be. A data scorecard plays the same role in data
quality improvement.




November 21, 2011April 5, 2021

Post navigation

Business Rules for Standardization: Bringing it all Together
Distributed Data and Distributed Information

  • Comments (0)
  • Write a Comment

Cancel Reply

Subscribe

About This Site

All data goes bad (up to 25% per year), whether due to data entry errors or the simple fact that consumers change jobs, move, update email addresses, marry, etc. At Melissa, we help companies harness the value of their Big Data, legacy data, and people data (names, addresses, phone numbers, and emails) to drive insight, maintain data quality, and support global intelligence.

Search

Find Us

Address
22382 Avenida Empresa
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688-2112

 

Hours
Monday—Friday: 9:00AM–5:00PM PST

Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: UNISCO by SnapThemes.